Would Insurers Stop Writing Policies For Kids Because Of Obamacare

For now it's just individual "policies, and Others Will Follow purpose, and We Have the Dems and Obama to thank for Their short-sightedness. Do Any of These Guys Have a clue how ANYTHING works?

excerpt ...
In Florida, Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Aetna, and Golden Rule - a Subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare - The Insurance commissioner Notified That They Will Stop Issuing Policies for Individual Children, Said Jack McDermott, a Spokesman for McCarty.

The major types of coverage for children - use plans and Government Programs - Are Not Be Affected By The disruption. But a subset of policies - Those That cover Children as Individuals - May Run Into Problems. Even so, Insurers are not children's coverage Canceling Already suivantes order refusing to write new policies.

The administration reacted sharply To The pullback. "We're disappointed That a small number of insurance companies are unwarranted and Unnecessary Taking this step," Said Jessica Santillo, a spokeswoman for The Health and Human Services department.

Starting Later this year, The Health Care Law Requires Insurers to overhaul accepted Children Regardless of medical problems - Major Benefit Of The early legislative complex. Insurers are worried That Will Wait Until parents get sick kids to sign them up, saddling The Companies With unpredictable Costs.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida from about 9.000 to 10,000 a year New Police That only cover Children. Vice President Randy Kammer Said The company's experts Calculated That Guaranteeing coverage for Children "could raise premiums for individual" Other Holders policy by As Much as 20 percent.

"We Believe That the Majority of People Who Would buy this policy Were going to use it Immediately, Probably for high cost claims," Said Kammer. "Guaranteed outcome Mean You could" buy it Technically On The Way To The Hospital. "
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Some-insur ...